Re: Accurate edge detection?

slus...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Wow.  Another fine example of how text-only communication can be
> misconstrued.  For this case, I'm honestly at a loss for how you came
> to the conclusion that I have the idea that I'm "...talking to a bunch
> of hick image processors..."  I came to this newsgroup asking
> questions because I knew I was ignorant, the topic was complex, and I
> wanted to learn.
> Spencer

Well, it it quite remarkable what sort of conversation had been
triggered by an innocent remark, concerning the third person (me).
Even if it is counterproductive and has nothing in common with the
topic's theme, this is why I love the Net. It is freedom, really
im****tant thing for boy like me, who great deal of his live lived
under permanent pressure. Well, this is a diversion only. But what
about you, Mr. Spencer? If you wanted to learn something, why you
didn't do it? You didn't ask me about restoration technique nor about
where such info could be obtained. Have you ever seen images, what I
placed onto my site ( http://www.smartfills.com/Html/Images/textdiffr.jpg
and http://www.smartfills.com/Html/Images/textrestr.jpg
)? Did you
understand, that diffracted image cannot be restored using such a poor
ideas like at which steepness of a slope true edge position is?
Similar situation with another distortions like aberration, scanner's
discretization and so on. Computer image processing lets one to get
such results, what hardly could be obtained by any optic itself.