Re: Accurate edge detection?

On Aug 2, 8:45=A0pm, aruzinsky <aruzin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Aug 2, 11:25=A0am, illywhacker <illywac...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On 2 Aug, 18:57, aruzinsky <aruzin...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> > > Huh? =A0"True" is an adjective and you still haven't explained your
> > > sarcasm.
>
> > > "Pure research" vs. "applied research" are standard usages. =A0Back
i=
n
> > > the 1960's, people payed for doing pure research in the USA didn't
> > > have to pay income tax on it. =A0Back then, pure researchers
deserved
> > > even more sarcasm.
>
> > 1) I have no need to explain to you a remark made to someone else. If
> > you still do not understand it, and you still wish to, think harder.
>
> > 2) Clearly you cannot distinguish between a variable and a value.
> > There is a standard saying in English which takes the form 'spoken
> > like a true X'. X can change; 'the word 'true' is part of the template
> > of this phrase.
>
> > 3) The past participle of 'to pay' is 'paid'.
>
> There are no standard template phrases, only popular phrases. =A0I think
> the best popular phrase to describe you is "monkey see, monkey do,"
> except, worse than the monkey, you have delusions that what you see
> and do is standardized.

As non sequitur's go, this is pretty good. I am sorry English is not
your first language. If it bothers you, go to a group in your native
language.

illywhacker;