Re: Accurate edge detection?

On 2 Aug, 10:32, Andrew_M <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > I haven't lost interest. =A0I don't understand illywacker's sarcasm of
> > "true researcher." =A0It would make more sense if he said "pure
> > researcher." =A0Commercial applied research that cannot be published
> > because of its proprietary nature is still true research but not pure
> > research. =A0On the other hand, most papers published in electrical
> > engineering journals represent pure research in the sense that their
> > findings have no foreseeable practical use. =A0For engineers, that is
> > immoral hypocrisy that deserves sarcasm. =A0And, IEEE typically
charges
> > $35 for you to buy a paper and then discover it is useless. =A0You
can'=
t
> > judge a paper by its abstract anymore than judge a book by its cover.
>
> Well, if so, what d'you think about my attempt to revert
> "irrevertible" transform?

'Inverting' an uninvertible transform is not a new thing. This is more
or less the definition of a so-called 'inverse problem'.

illywhacker;