On Jun 13, 6:46=A0pm, Martin Leese <ple...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> aruzinsky wrote:
> > Is it possible to convert a video tape (of the case type) into a
> > series of digital still frames and then back to video tape without
> > being detectable?
>
> > If not, what is the approximate PSNR or whatever metric of error of
> > the current best process?
>
> A news story stated:
> =A0 =A0 "Expert witnesses for the prosecution
> =A0 =A0 =A0said that the VHS tape, whose origin is
> =A0 =A0 =A0unknown, was a multigeneration copy but
> =A0 =A0 =A0had not been tampered with."
>
> My understanding is that the defense did not
> argue that the tape wasn't genuine, but that
> the man in it was not R. Kelly.
>
> Given that the tape is a copy of a copy of a
> ... then no metric is going to help.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Martin Leese
> E-mail: ple...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web:http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/
You didn't answer my questions.
Expert witnesses in court are a sham in this case and most other
cases. To be an adequate video expert witness, one must be able to
answer my questions accurately and provide verifiable evidence.
Otherwise, no adequate video expert witnesses exist.
I am trying to decide whether all cases of that type, in which video
evidence has no sup****ting verbal testimony, fingerprints, DNA
evidence, etc to link the defendent to the video, should be thrown out
of court. I, a resident of Crook County, IL, helped fund that
prosecution which was a complete waste of my tax money. I want to
prove that that prosecution should never have been attempted. Do you
find government waste acceptable?
|
