On Jun 5, 1:57 pm, byaa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Jun 4, 10:54 pm, Industrial One <industrial_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 4, 2:32 pm, byaa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
> > > What is the storage format for video surveillance solutions? Is it
> > > MPEG2 or H.264 or something open?
>
> > > B
>
> > Personally I'd use H.264 as its superior code effectively removes most
> > of the redundancy in a video where there's movement only once an hour.
> > Whoever would use MPEG2 is a dumbass.
>
> Let me clarify my question...
> Is there a standard encoding used by most commercial video
> surveillance solutions today?
Now we're gettin' somewhere. Unfortunetaly, you ain't gettin a
straight answer, 'cuz I don't do surveillance. But I can tell you that
no serious firm utilizes MPEG2 anymore. A tweaked build of MPEG 4-10
(H264) is the most probable. I can't validate this but it's possible
that standards primarily built for surveillance and conference videos
may also be in practice, (keywords: Pulsent and Euclid technologies.)
|
