Talk About Network

Google





Graphics > Image processing > Re: question ab...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 4 Topic 4589 of 4998
Post > Topic >>

Re: question about dilation

by ImageAnalyst <imageanalyst@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 5, 2008 at 03:44 PM

On Jun 5, 8:59=A0am, luca.pampar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am currently doing a threhold based segmentation (Otsu segmentation)
> on an image and would like to connect some of the voxels using
> dilation. What is the normal approach here? Usually, what kind of
> structuring element would one use? is there a rule to determine this
> or do you just try different ones till one of them seems to work?
> Also, what about the subsequent erosion? What sort of structuring
> element is recommended there?
>
> Thanks,
> Luca

----------------------------------------------------
Luca:
I usually do a closing (dilation followed by erosion) rather than a
dilation because I want to end up with the same size structures before
segmentation rather than larger structures.  I use a round structuring
element because if I use a box or cube I get artifacts.  If you use a
square structuring element on an image of a thin ring-shaped
structure, you'll see bogus artifacts at 45 degrees, 135 degrees,
etc.  These are minimized with a circle.  Try different window sizes
and on the original gray scale image or on the binarizy, thresholded
image and just see what works best in your situation.
Regards,
ImageAnalyst
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
question about dilation
luca.pamparana@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-05 05:59:17 
Re: question about dilation
Frank Schmitt <userepl  2008-06-05 16:27:56 
Re: question about dilation
ImageAnalyst <imageana  2008-06-05 15:44:31 
Re: question about dilation
"Science.Medical.Ima  2008-06-07 09:18:46 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 19:18:50 PST 2009.