In article <0001HW.C4BCEF93009BCF30B026B9AF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:01:59 -0500, Jolly Roger wrote (in article
> <jollyroger-CC79D4.17015904082008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
> > In article <0001HW.C4BCE4E600994EADB026B9AF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >> I have a do***ent I created using iWork '08 Pages, a do***ent that
uses a
> >> number of color gradients for backgrounds, the gradients being
different
> >> on different pages. I ex****ted the do***ent as a .pdf so it could be
> >> viewed in such as Preview or Adobe Reader. The colors presented by
> >> Preview seem right on but those presented by Adobe Reader are not,
being
> >> somewhat murky when compared to what is seen in Pages.
> >>
> >> So, the question is, can something be done so that what Adobe Reader
> >> displays is essentially similar in terms of color rendition as to
what
> >> Preview displays?
> >
> > I'm betting Adobe Reader is honoring the color calibration settings of
the
> > PDF, while Preview is not. Note that if your screen is not calibrated,
> > correctly-rendered calibrated content may appear "murky".
>
> The display on my Macbook Pro had been calibrated and that setting is
the
> active one. I've also checked the .pdf display with Acrobat CS3 and the
> colors there appear the same as in Adobe Reader. How can one check the
> calibration settings of a .pdf?
I'm sure you'd have to open it in Adobe Reader or Adobe Acrobat and look
around in Do***ent Settings.
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than to me, as
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
|
