Re: Magnifying JPEGs viewed in Safari?

In article 
<doraymeRidThis-A7CA7F.10592106052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 dorayme <doraymeRidThis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> In article <slrng1ufgr.15qa.g.kreme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  Lewis <g.kreme@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> > In message
<doraymeRidThis-0B1751.13012903052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> >   dorayme <doraymeRidThis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > what would dialup users or slow broadband think?).
> > 
> > Sorry, but I stopped worrying about dialup users 6 years ago when the
last
> > person in my family finally got ADSL. I hear there are still people on
> > dialup, but I could not prove it.
> 
> Why did you ever worry about dialup? Do you make websites only for your 
> family?
> 
> > 
> > > The advantage is bandwidth and clarity, especially bandwidth. No one

> > > wants to download a 2592 px wide pic if they are only interested in 
> > > seeing it at 400px.
> > 
> > But they take the same amount of time (that is, 'none') to download!
:)
> 
> This is not true for many people (not you or your family who maybe have 
> superfast), even on what is broadly known as broadband. And it is 
> demonstrably false when you take into account a set of pictures.

Very true.  And from another point of view, a channel only has so much 
capacity (bits/second).  It may be very high, but it is finite.  People 
who waste bandwidth slow the internet down for everybody.