Re: Ray tracing in OCaml (revisited)

Jon Harrop wrote:
> This faster OCaml implementation is still much more concise than TBP's
C++
> and is now only 20% slower:

The OCaml implementation is now outperforming the C++ implementation
compiled with g++ 4.2.3:

  http://www.ffconsultancy.com/languages/ray_tracer/results.html

Albeit, because the g++ compiled code is getting slower with newer
versions
of g++...

Looking back, Thierry Berger-Perrin claimed he could write a much faster
C++
implementation. How is that coming along? ;-)

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?u