Talk About Network

Google





Graphics > Raytracing rendering software > Re: physically ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 5 Topic 503 of 588
Post > Topic >>

Re: physically accurate and unbiased ??? (also posted on misc, please reply here!)

by "mast2as@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <mast2as@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 6, 2006 at 03:47 AM

ouah  very cool, thanks a lot...

mljack wrote:
> Check the link below:
> http://cgafaq.info/wiki/Bias_in_rendering
>
> mast2as@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > hi guys, i was looking at a couple of renderers recently (Maxwell and
> > another project that a japanese person develop) and they claim to be
> > physically correct and ubiased. I guess I can have a rough idea aout
> > what they mean by physically accurate, starting with the fact that
> > color are probably represented in the form of wavelenght, but how can
> > the solution be unbiased ? I guess it probably implements a rencent
> > paper on light trans****t ? that allows you to pretend the result is
> > unbiased. Does anybody could point me to some reference material on
> > that ? Does anybody know what light algorithm is implemented in a
> > renderer like Maxwell for example, thank you, mark
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
physically accurate and unbiased ??? (also posted on misc, pleas
"mast2as@[EMAIL PROT  2006-09-05 12:46:07 
Re: physically accurate and unbiased ??? (also posted on misc, p
"Anthony D'Agostino&  2006-09-05 18:23:27 
Re: physically accurate and unbiased ??? (also posted on misc, p
"mljack" <ml  2006-09-06 01:13:04 
Re: physically accurate and unbiased ??? (also posted on misc, p
"mast2as@[EMAIL PROT  2006-09-06 03:47:38 
Re: physically accurate and unbiased ??? (also posted on misc, p
thomas.ludwig@[EMAIL PROT  2006-09-17 12:00:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 20:33:40 PST 2009.