Talk About Network

Google





Graphics > Photoshop 2 > Re: Canon Camer...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 21 of 39 Topic 5122 of 5219
Post > Topic >>

Re: Canon Camera Decisions

by "Dirty Harry" <nothin@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 6, 2008 at 02:56 AM

"Mike Russell" <groupsRE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:1l0tpc42q1uww$.dlg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:03:20 GMT, Dirty Harry wrote:
>
>> "Mike Russell" <groupsRE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:fyovb4vj0hnf.dlg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:08:49 GMT, Dirty Harry wrote:
>>>
>>>> Exactly!  There are those who wish to learn the craft and those who 
>>>> whish
>>>> to
>>>> point and click.
>>>
>>> I know what you're thinking. "Did he fire 21 megapixels or only
eight?"
>>> Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost
track
>>> myself. But being as this is a .Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III SLR Digital 
>>> Camera,
>>> the most powerful DSLR in the world, and would blow your head clean
off,
>>> you've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya,
>>> punk?
>>>
>>> The point is, Callahan, that the mayor's office wants you to start 
>>> playing
>>> by the book.  Judge a photographer by his or her pictures, not the
>>> equipment, or we're going to have to throw your whole case out again.
>>>
>>> Equipment is not the be all, nor are all non-SLR's automated toys.  If

>>> you
>>> believe that, then you're playing the role of a photo snob.  DLSR's
are,
>>> IMHO, an odious legacy from a now ancient 20th century analog world of
>>> gears and moving mirrors, only the film has been yanked out and a 
>>> digital
>>> sensor put in.
>>>
>>> All that said, I'll put up with a lot of poor attitude and behavior, 
>>> even
>>> the type you've shown, if your images are excellent.  So you've got to

>>> ask
>>> yourself one question: do you have any pictures on line that might
>>> impress?
>>> Well, do ya ... ?
>>> -- 
>>> Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
>>
>> I'm glad you asked as I'm a huge fan of night time photography.  Darn, 
>> you
>> cant do that on a point and shoot because most of them have a max open
>> shutter time of 15 seconds and even at 15 seconds the sensor noise is
>> BRUTAL!  Why?  It's a physical limitation because of the sensor size,
>> they're trying to pack all those mega pixels on to an area the size of
my
>> thumb nail.  The small sensor also leads to a very small lens on the 
>> front.
>> Guess what that means?  It means you're not going to be taking any
photos
>> with a nice background blur (unless you're in the macro range, not so 
>> good
>> for ****traits).  The depth of field on a p&s is about equivalent to f
16 
>> on
>> an slr (look it up if you don't believe me).  You might not want 
>> background
>> blur for everything but its nice to have the option, I don't know how 
>> many
>> people have asked me "can you do those pictures with the blurry 
>> background?"
>> http://www.dustingodwinphoto.com/bird.jpg
 see the nice cage cause it
was
>> shot in a zoo?  Nope but on a p&s you sure would!
>> Some night shots that would be IMPOSSIBLE to take on a p&s:
>> http://dustingodwinphoto.com/landscapes/images/img_1425.jpg
- judging
by 
>> the
>> star trails that was at least a 5 min exposure.
>> http://dustingodwinphoto.com/landscapes/images/img_0689_5x7.jpg
this
was
>> probably only 10-15 seconds but it's completely noise free.
>>
http://dustingodwinphoto.com/landscapes/images/fireworks_img_2715_4x6.jpg
>> http://dustingodwinphoto.com/landscapes/images/framed_img_7461.jpg
>> http://dustingodwinphoto.com/edmonton/images/pyramids100007_rt8.jpg
>> http://dustingodwinphoto.com/reddeer/images/IMG_8026.jpg
- 30
seconds...
>> I could dig up another 100 images taken at night that wouldn't be 
>> possible
>> on a p&s but I haven't updated the site in forever...
>>
>> Now don't get me wrong, even I say to myself it would be nice to have a
>> little camera I could throw in my pocket but for anything serious I'd
be
>> chocked at myself if I saw something awesome and I was stuck without my

>> slr.
>> ARGH how do I get a shallow DOF on this thing?  What?  I can't take my 
>> night
>> pictures unless I want more grain then the local wheat pool?  Why am I
>> pressing the button and nothing is happening (waits for 2 seconds for
the
>> camera to finally take the picture)?  I love it when I let someone try
my
>> camera and they take about 10 pictures the first time they press the 
>> button
>> because they're not expecting the camera to work so fast, followed by a
>> "holy ****!"
>
> Well, I gotta say these are some fine images, Dirty Harry.  I'll give
you
> some slack.  I'm a fan of night photography too.
> -- 
> Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com

Well thanks :-)
 




 39 Posts in Topic:
Canon Camera Decisions
Nick <digitalcamerarev  2008-08-22 02:12:36 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"Dirty Harry" &  2008-08-25 16:39:42 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Mike Russell <groupsRE  2008-08-25 12:25:58 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Dave <dave@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-25 22:20:33 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Mike Russell <groupsRE  2008-08-25 23:01:43 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"KatWoman" <  2008-08-26 14:11:44 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Dave <dave@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-27 09:51:06 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Dave <dave@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-27 10:07:02 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"KatWoman" <  2008-08-27 13:35:19 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"Leo Lichtman"   2008-09-17 02:10:36 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Joe <joe@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-08-28 14:13:11 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Dave <dave@[EMAIL PROT  2008-08-29 00:00:13 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"Dirty Harry" &  2008-09-03 20:57:18 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Mike Russell <groupsRE  2008-09-03 14:56:43 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"Dirty Harry" &  2008-09-03 21:00:17 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"KatWoman" <  2008-09-04 14:53:08 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"Dirty Harry" &  2008-09-05 00:08:49 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Mike Russell <groupsRE  2008-09-04 21:52:37 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"Dirty Harry" &  2008-09-05 16:03:20 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Mike Russell <groupsRE  2008-09-05 09:24:53 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"Dirty Harry" &  2008-09-06 02:56:37 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"KatWoman" <  2008-09-06 15:10:01 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"Dirty Harry" &  2008-09-05 16:19:18 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"Dirty Harry" &  2008-09-06 03:24:50 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"ronviers@[EMAIL PRO  2008-09-05 01:34:08 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Mike Russell <groupsRE  2008-09-05 01:51:56 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
James McNangle <mcnang  2008-09-06 12:58:26 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"Dirty Harry" &  2008-09-06 03:22:20 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
James McNangle <mcnang  2008-09-07 11:24:59 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"KatWoman" <  2008-09-06 15:07:46 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
James McNangle <mcnang  2008-09-07 09:17:48 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Joe <joe@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-09-09 15:52:08 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"ronviers@[EMAIL PRO  2008-09-05 02:51:54 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"ronviers@[EMAIL PRO  2008-09-19 15:33:46 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Mike Russell <groupsRE  2008-09-19 20:48:09 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"ronviers@[EMAIL PRO  2008-09-19 22:32:37 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
Mike Russell <groupsRE  2008-09-19 22:45:29 
Re: Canon Camera Decisions
"ronviers@[EMAIL PRO  2008-09-20 09:12:04 
Video Color Correction (was: Canon Camera Decisions)
Mike Russell <groupsRE  2008-09-20 12:45:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 3:37:59 PST 2009.