"aloneatlast" <alone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:d2b0cce0-e8ba-4ede-a542-7178c0c6eb49@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You may have read the New Yorker article about the retoucher of
> models, Pascal Dangin.
>
> My question concerns the photos the New Yorker included in the piece,
> that show his skill. They can be seen here:
>
> http://models.com/feed/?p=359
>
> The idea is the bottom photo is the original, the top is retouched.
>
> Here's the thing: it appears to me that it is the top that is the
> original, and the bottom the retouched version-- in other words, it
> looks like Dangin made the model LESS perfect.
>
> Note the carry of the arm, the position of the hand, finger length;
> how the light in the bottom "original" seems to hit her arm and butt
> from top right and a little out of the page, yet the face is dark.
>
> It may be some retouching was done in both photos.
>
> I would not put this past Dangin, if it's true. But I'm hoping I can
> get some people more expert than me to weigh in.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
my opinion >>not the same exact frame
one from same series
|
