If you're just needing static curtains, then you're fine with what you
have. If you mean as in cloth curtains that would react to dynamics
such as wind & gravity, then Motion Designer is pretty much what you'll
need to use. It's gotten a lot more robust and controlable in 8.5 and
9.0 than in 7.5.
M.
mallecort@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>On Jun 8, 5:10?pm, Ma3rk <m3dwhit...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>>You might want to make a list & check what you have plug-in wise and see
>>if there's an upgrade option. For example, all of Worley's products do;
>>free for the most part. And somethings have simply been incor****ated
>>into the basic LW install or functionality not needing any sort of
>>upgrade. Relativity for example; couple others I can't rmemeber right
now.
>>
>>Lastly, if you're not familiar withwww.flay.com, you should bookmark it
>>as a primary LW resource.
>>
>>M.
>>
>>
>>
>>jon wrote:
>>
>>
>>>rossmcd wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Not much action around here lately!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>let's all post a question to the group!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>My question I'm still on LW 5.6 should or is it advisable to upgrade
to
>>>>9.2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Regards Rossmcd
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Sounds like me. I too am a tombstone user. I don't see the benefit of
>>>upgrading a product that will be render all my hundreds of dollars
>>>worth of plugins useless. I would only upgrade if I found a lightwave
>>>job in Vancouver working for the sci-fi channel:) Where are all the cg
>>>jobs anyway? I can't find any near where I live on hotjobs.com. Are
>>>there any websites advertising lightwave work anywhere?- Hide quoted
text -
>>>
>>>
>>- Show quoted text -
>>
>>
>
> I'm still using 5.6 on my mac, also 7.5 on a pc. the main diff being
>that my 400 mhz mac did a section of an animation in 29 hours as
>opposed to the much newer pc doing same in under an hour.
>
> Here is a question: How would I make a set of curtains for an
>interior in 7.5 ? I did a quick google and they all seemed to use
>motion designer, something I haven't used yet. Is that the only way ?
>
>
>
>
|
