Michael Schumacher <schumaml@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>JR the Postman <JR_the_Postman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:14:25 -0700, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>
>> > Hm... was the link in the last paragraph added after you posted here?
>
>> No that is how my newsgroup software handles urls recently, cut and
past
>> if you can not click on the link...
>
>The blog post you've linked to does contain another link (which I was
>refering to) to a 2.6.0 release announcement. Written by someone who
>apparently thought that this version would bring higher bit depths due
>to the dependency on GEGL.
It contains a link to another blog post by exactly the
same person. That person seems to have misread
something, because the links are to actual GIMP 2.6
Release Notes that do *NOT* claim that 2.6.0 can edit 16
bit image files, and if fact specifically state that it is
still limited to 8 bit files.
>If I assume that the subject of your post does contain what you are
>trying to telling us, then I have to conclude that you are wrong - the
>author of the post you linked to has provided a reason for not using
>GIMP. If this is not what you were trying to tell, when you should
>rephrase you message.
It takes a good bit of imagination to figure out what
wasn't said.
--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
