Talk About Network

Google





Graphics > GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program) > Re: ImageMagick...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 3020 of 3173
Post > Topic >>

Re: ImageMagick vs. Gimp TIFF file conversion (file size issue)

by Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <bj_666@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 10, 2008 at 06:50 PM

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:47:04 +0200, Fr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Stef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

> I produced TIFF files from imagick6.3.5 on SuSE-10.3/64-bit.
> These files are 16104166 bytes each and are in 8-bit depth.
> 
> Now, when I open such a file with Gimp, the gimp-knows-8-bit-
> only-warning appears and I then have to select one of the
> subimages (image 0 or image1). I selcet the first image (image 0)
> and open it. Then I resave it as an 8-bit TIFF. Afterwards,
> file size is only 8046586 bytes each, which is about 50 percent
> of the original size.
> 
> How can I get this result with image magick (convert) for a
> batch use? A convert like
> 
>    like convert file.tiff -depth 8 file-8bit.tiff
> 
> gives no reduction in file size. What does Gimp do to make those
> files about 50% smaller and how can this be done with imagick?

I'm a bit puzzled -- you have a TIFF file containing two images and are
wondering why the images saved separately are only half the size in bytes
of both images combined!?

Ciao,
	Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
ImageMagick vs. Gimp TIFF file conversion (file size issue)
"Fr@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-07-10 13:47:04 
Re: ImageMagick vs. Gimp TIFF file conversion (file size issue)
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch   2008-07-10 18:50:38 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 22:01:17 PST 2009.