* Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
> bucky3 <bucky3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>On May 28, 2:28 pm, "Fr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stef@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <f...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> what can the heal brush do that clone tool can't?
>>> Image or video examples appreciated :)
>>
>>I get somewhat confused by the heal brush as well. I think the heal
>>tool is used for scenarios where there is a blemish that needs to be
>>removed, and the heal tool will do a better job than clone. But if you
>>actually want to clone a ****tion of the image, heal tool will not do
>>it.
>
> The heal tool will do a better job of removing oddities
> in a small area. A couple of unusual spots in a
> textured area, for example. It essentially compares two
> areas and removes differences. However, it is very slow
> compared to the clone tool, and when used on a large
> area it simply takes forever...
>
> The clone tool, unlike the heal tool, totally ignores
> the area under the brush, and unceremoniously replaces
> it with the selected "clone" area. It is much faster,
> and for large areas is therefore significantly easier.
>
> I do a lot of "people" pictures, and often use the heal
> tool to touch up facial blemishes. To remove unwanted
> objects from the background the clone tool is better,
> and sometimes the smudge tool is even more better.
<snip />
I use the heal tool to get rid of sensor dust spots from digital
images too.
--
Troy Piggins | http://piggo.com/~troy
_ __ (_) __ _ __ _
___
| '_ \| |/ _` |/ _`
|/ _ \
| .__/|_|\__, |\__,
|\___/
|_| |___/ |___/
|
