Re: Photoshop vs Gimp Adjustment Layers

stuseven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On May 8, 4:38 pm, "stuse...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <stuse...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>   
>> On May 8, 1:35 pm, measekite <inkysti...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>>> I have used both Photoshop and Gimp.  I like Gimp because of lack of
>>> cost and it does many nice things.  PS is ahead in printing but I can
>>> make Gimp do the job.
>>>       
>>> The big difference is PS sup****ts subsequent editing of layers and
they
>>> sup****t adjustment layers.  So far Gimp does not sup****t either.  Has
>>> anybody figured out a way to mimic adjustment layers in Gimp?
>>>       
>>> Lets say you have a stack of 4 layers:
>>>       
>>> Unsharp Mask
>>> Curves
>>> Layers
>>> Background
>>>       
>>> I would like each layer to combine its thing with the layer below but
>>> not block the underlying layers.  The additive blending mode does not
>>> seem to do it the way adjustment layers does in PS.
>>>       
>> which is why I always do this in ImageMagick(!)- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>>     
>
> but, if you want to do it directly in Gimp Layers, you'll need to
> adjust opacity/transparency of each layer... otherwise, only the top
> layer - at
> 100% opacity - will show in your final image
>   
What about blending modes?

Also is there a wish list somewhere that the developers pay attention 
to.  It seems that adjustment layers and being able to edit layers along 
with better printing capability for photos should be highest on the list 
but I never hear anything about them.