Amanda wrote:
>Will Dockery wrote:
>> Rob Evans, mushmouth poet <http://tinyurl.com/6gf5yh>
wrote:
>>>Amanda wrote:
>>>>George Dance wrote:
>
> > >>>>> If you don't like reading about Will Dockery, why are you
writing=
about him? Why do keep trying, as here, to turn completely
> > >>>>>unrelated threads into threads about him?
> > >>>>> It sounds to me like you just enjoy *****ing, and that you like
w=
riting about Will Dockery because it gives you more
> > >>>>>op****tunity to *****.
>
> > >>>> Hey, it's orders of magnitude better than writing about George
Dan=
ce.
>
> > > > >>> Yet it seems you and two (so far) of your fellow kooks can't
re=
sist
> > > > >>> doing that, either.
> > > > >>> Too bad that the writing that rap was set up for - "the
posting=
of
> > > > >>> poems" - is beyond the capacities of all three of you.
>
> > >>>> Poor little Amanda's down to reposting the same
scatalogical-homop=
hobic limerick over and over... pathetic and boring.
> > >>>> The same limerick garbage for at least a couple of years now.
>
> > >>>><homophobic scatalogical garbage snipped>
>
> > > > >> The same ''scatalogical-homophobic'' garbage, yes.
>
> > > > > =A0 I'm not homophobic.
>
> > > > Right, like making your many statements like ''the only good
nigger=
is a dead nigger'' doesn't make you a racist.
>
> > > Nope. =A0It makes me a jurist.
>
> > Do tell.
>
> > > > Your homophobia seems to be tied in with your /self hatred/ and
fea=
r
> > > > of your own obvious latent home***uality.
>
> > > > > =A0 I just don't like /you/.
>
> > > > Ah, so you ****tray me as a homo***ual... which means that
depicting=
me in homo***ual acts is intended as an insult, thus you're homophobic,
> > > > since you consider these acts to be a ''bad thing''.
>
> > > Your homo***uality is
>
> > One of your more pathetic fantasies, and as explained, a projection of
> > your own obvious latent homo***uality/self-hatred.
>
> > > =A0 frequent, even desperate, cocksucking
> > > homo***uality. =A0you're a little faggot
>
> > I'll remind you of how Karla Rogers nailed you and your type in her
> > statement last year, Amanda -
>
> > "...Those types of pictures are offensive to me but I can also be
> > offended
> > by what someone writes. We communicate less by pictures on the poetry
> > newsgroups but that doesn't mean that the picture words we create
> > aren't as offensive as a picture. It's just that the picture as
> > communication has more shock value because we use pictures less here.
> > Now, I have no idea what most of you mean when you bash someone by
> > depicting them in homo***ual acts, whether it is with words or
> > pictures. What I mean is, using it here may not mean that you're anti-
> > gay, homophobic, ***ist, etc. I have no idea. But the cheap shot isn't
> > helpful and promotes ***ist and homophobic thinking..."
> > -Karla explains the /Uncle Hammes type/.
>
> > > > Thanks for proving my point, Amanda.
>
> > Repeatedly.
>
> I'll let you know when the experiment is over.
Heh... but for now you seem to be shut up by your ''betters'', little
bug**** Amanda.
--
Truck Stop Woman [video] by Dockery-Conley
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DjXA4jekz_xk
|
