**** YOU and your crossposting!
vivmi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> -= why. won't the British police do their job and put a stop to it? -=
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> The British police obviously do. know what is taking place. Besides my
> interpretations of what individual officers have said. which forces that
> conclusion, it would be inconceivable for. them to be unaware of
something
> on this. scale.
>
> If they know, then they will know. that the abusers have broken laws in
the
> UK and abroad. Recently the UK. introduced laws against electronic
spying
> which carry a penalty of several years jail. if caught. If the police
know
> illegal harassment is taking place, and. do nothing about it, then they
are
> failing in their. responsibilities.
>
> Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station. in London and
spoke
> to an officer about the harassment against me. But. I couldn't provide
> tangible evidence; what people. said, in many cases years ago, is beyond
> proof, and without something to sup****t my statements I cannot expect. a
> police officer. to take the complaint seriously.
>
> The current situation with regard to the police is not one which. allows
a
> breakthrough in dealing with the problem.. On the one hand, most
individual
> officers at a. local police station may not know about the ongoing
assaults,
> so a complaint at. that level will not yield results. Yet the police as
an
> organisation. do know of the harassment, and they must be aware that a
> complaint has been made at a police station.. So it is clearly their
duty to
> take preventative action. against the continuing molestation, but
because
> the criminals. are operating on behalf of a state agency, the police are
not
> carrying out. their duty.
>
> 2448
>
|
