On Thu, 10 May 2007 09:18:15 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
<°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On 9 May 2007 21:28:02 -0500, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>> On Sun, 06 May 2007 07:05:00 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>>> <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Sat, 5 May 2007 22:20:38 -0600, "Beta_Troll"
>>> ><BetaTroll@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>"nymnuts©" <nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> >>news:tq4o335oja26m95771plp53vq0ftuckroi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >>> On 4 May 2007 23:52:02 -0500, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>> In article <1gcl331e7hb9jmnkgtn0ghulbclret7219@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>> >>>>> nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> >On Tue, 01 May 2007 11:21:07 -0400, Gogarty
>>> >>>>> ><Gogarty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> >>In article <f9ed33ttn3b0obunnarvioqc6c01jt2i1d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>> >>>>> >>nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>>> >>>>> >>
>>> >>>>> >>>
>>> >>>>> >>>I'll pass on pgp, even if it means not being able
>>> >>>>> >>>to find the imaginary 'secret group'. <bfg>
>>> >>>>> >>>
>>> >>>>> >>Me too.
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> >Hello, Mr. Gogarty!
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> >Nice to see you're still about!
>>> >>>>> >I do hope you've been finding it
>>> >>>>> >worthwhile to visit here.
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> >Feel free to join in!
>>> >>>>> >
>>> >>>>> >--
>>> >>>>> >nymnuts©
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Thank you. It's always nice to feel welcomed.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> As for PGP, it's not the complexity (which I understand is far
>>> >>>>> less than it used to be) but that it does not square with my
>>> >>>>> number one tenet: TRUST NO ONE!
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>hehe! When I troll for fun, I like to say "You can trust a Troll!"
>>> >>>>cause we
>>> >>>>all know that's so false.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> But, can I trust your statement?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> If not, then the opposite of your statement infers
>>> >>> that trust *could* exist. This would then tend to
>>> >>> validate your statement as you have originally
>>> >>> stated it, making it true that trust cannot exist.
>>> >>> Which means, of course...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> My head hurts.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> nymnuts©
>>> >>
>>> >>Your arse will hurt more after I finish butt****ing you again.
>>> >>Stupid dumbnuts.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >oi...Fachans gettin romantiK again...
>>> >
>>> > d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> >
>>> >"have U brainwashed 2day?"
>>>
>>> Nah, it's just Daytek playing.
>>>
>>> --
>>> nymnuts©
>>>
>>
>>LOL! Boo and hiss on you for telling. And I went to the trouble of using
MS
>>outhouse to look real.<BG> Did it make you feel 'at home again'?
>
>
>well...its the usual "modus operandi" from most trolls 2 switch
>niX/readers/services when doin it...
Yes, most trolls are smart enough to do that.
One exception was that idiot who used to flame
you for posting videos in Innocence. Switched
nyms well enough, but always used the same news
reader, antivirus, and NSP (with visible IP).
Quite funny that it could never seem to figure
out how we could always tell that it was the
same troll every time.
>even if no one may believe me:
>I *only* use this nick 4 any kind of grillparties <g>
>
> d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>"have U brainwashed 2day?"
>
>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=786048453686176230&q=terrorstorm
Grillparty? I'll be on the next plane to see ya.
It's been many years since I visited my homeland,
and I still plan to visit again just once before
I expire.
Oh, you meant grilling trolls. Yes, that can be
quite fun as well..
--
nymnuts©


|