Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Graphics > Art Theft Scream Scream Scream > Re: What potent...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 74 of 106 Topic 530 of 558
Post > Topic >>

Re: What potential

by enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Enig) May 6, 2007 at 10:57 PM

nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:07bl339quqsnple044v55mp02qgeplqucq@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> On Tue, 01 May 2007 07:20:53 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
><°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, 01 May 2007 05:09:58 +0000, nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>wrote: 
>>
>>>On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:09:36 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>>><°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 04:47:46 +0000, nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>wrote: 
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:41:28 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>>>>><°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:00:38 -0400, Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>wrote: 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In article <ofn433d3pmacfqqj89qfbd7ica11kg8q5a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says... 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:30:59 -0400, Gogarty
>>>>>>>><Gogarty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In article <ff6333d0h35ejurk18vus4sn5am1kla2re@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>>>>>°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says... 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:33:08 +0000, nymnuts©
>>>>>>>>>><nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:17:33 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>>>>>>>>>>><°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:18:10 +0000, nymnuts©
>>>>>>>>>>>><nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 25 Apr 2007 21:33:03 -0500, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4 Apr 2007 21:40:01 -0500, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Is it worthwhile hanging out here for awhile?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >I check here at least once a week for any postings and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >just read them. Mostly, people ping an individual, leave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >a msg, small talk. At times a post will bring lurkers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >and old timers out of the woodwork. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >The old posters are few these days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >But do check here to see what might be happening.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lurkers?  Old timers?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey!  I resemble that remark!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nymnuts©
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Good God! The old timer has spoken! Great to see you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Great to be here!  Great to see you as well.  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>I don't get on much anymore - there's not much 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>new in 'Usednet' these days, it seems.  Repost 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>after endless repost.  It was one helluva ride, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>though, wasn't it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>after all those nice ls-videos & models there was really
>>>>>>>>>>>>nothing what was worth collecting in the (young) **** fields
>>>>>>>>>>>>since ... 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>gladly since I started this "special interest hobby" about a
>>>>>>>>>>>>decade ago I always collected also NN-models from the start
>>>>>>>>>>>>,so this brings still @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 least some good harvests,although I
>>>>>>>>>>>>collect mostly vids & DVDs now (have a overkill with
>>>>>>>>>>>>collecting pixies) 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>>>>>>>>>>>  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"have U brainwashed 2day?"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>High, Doc! <g>  Good to see you're still about.
>>>>>>>>>>>Without your efforts Innocence would certainly 
>>>>>>>>>>>be lost.  I don't think I am able to post there 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>yeah,AOI is a never ending "problemchild" ... <s>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>anymore - you may remember propagation issues I 
>>>>>>>>>>>was always having.  And no Alan?  No Brundle?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>no idea what happened 2 them,
>>>>>>>>>>1 was using terrornews (bad service) ...
>>>>>>>>>>miss their posting-sup****t,buTT best post this year from others
>>>>>>>>>>was definately those both 2 Morena Park-rips (hope 4 mo in the
>>>>>>>>>>future) 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>So many ISPs block groups at the drop of a hat 
>>>>>>>>>>>these days.  Perhaps this has happened with 
>>>>>>>>>>>their NSPs?  Yet the flood of spam continues 
>>>>>>>>>>>in every group unabated...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>mostly from newsfeeds
>>>>>>>>>>(also verizon & astra)
>>>>>>>>>>spammishers R really the worst case of parasites,
>>>>>>>>>>and like pigeons or rats they bring only cancer
>>>>>>>>>>2 most groups along with trolls
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>PS: still hope some day mo ls-videos pops-up,
>>>>>>>>>>like stuff what never had been released due 2 closings
>>>>>>>>>>of the sites AND mebbe even videos in *better quality*
>>>>>>>>>>from the earlier issues - especially from issue 4
>>>>>>>>>>( have a crush 4 the blackhaired cutie :O)
>>>>>>>>>>or from those videoangels/video2000-releases
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>A news group exists that may satisfy your needs. Everything ever
>>>>>>>>>connected with LS, etc., seems to be getting posted there,
>>>>>>>>>thousands of posts daily. I don't see how they physically manage
>>>>>>>>>to do it. I don't know how to give you a hint that you will
>>>>>>>>>understand but the spammers won't. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>believe I know the spot already since quite some while
>>>>>>>>(Eggplant tiped me once;O)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>>>>>>>  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"have U brainwashed 2day?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Think really, really bad weather and a popular ***ual position.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>so there is another froup ,
>>>>>>if its "straight softcore" I should seek it then ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>>>>>  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"have U brainwashed 2day?"
>>>>>
>>>>>AFAIK it's no big secret, and by no means a new group.
>>>>>You should already know it well:  a.b.camille .  The 
>>>>>clues above are slanted toward Americans, which both 
>>>>>of us are not.  Happy hunting - I no longer collect.
>>>>>Still hope to see familiar 'faces' from time to time, 
>>>>>which is the extent of my interest in Usednet at this  point in
>>>>>time. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>ah,have heard of once & then 4gotten again,will check the headers
>>>>soon (tanks,btw.) 
>>>>
>>>IIRC, the web interface provided by your NSP should 
>>>go back some 30+ days.  Been a looong while since I 
>>>used Sleazynews.  (Since 2003 to be exact)  :-( 
>>>
>>>>just saw over ls some dissident is back & sharing now his favs-good
>>>>taste,his blond darling was also on my top-list (never 4get how she
>>>>answers phonecalls on some videoangels <g>)
>>>>
>>>>     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>>>  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>
>>>>"have U brainwashed 2day?"
>>>
>>>I have met dissident some months back.  I've been 
>>>thiking of popping in to say hello, but I can't 
>>>remember what sock I used then.  (Yes, I too have 
>>>been guilty of some minor nick-switching in the  past.)
>>
>>
>>well,everybody should do "his duty" on his playgrounds-
>>Iam sure many watch the headers of my spots as well
>>(and may also pick some random rosins outta the usenetcake)
>>
> Indeed. I picked up a serie I had missed 
> in Innocence recently...  Tanks!
> 
> Sorry, but I'm not likely to post much.  
> My hands and fingers are giving me some 
> trouble of late.  Soon I will type like 
> Mr. beer burp.

LOL

i think people font link me. my be i should go by beer fart. LOL 
every tinme i show up everyone thing it stink.  no matter.  I don't make 
waves. I have beer to mke thing bearavle\ 

goodf luck on keeping typing\ you keep the froup going. people like you.
:-)

i not seeing cleasrluy right now. to much beer but i not a troll jus
someone 
with a aasdifctb
 




 106 Posts in Topic:
April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-01 09:29:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-01 22:40:08 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-02 22:28:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-03 01:29:05 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-03 20:05:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-03 23:27:01 
What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-04 07:58:35 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-04 21:40:01 
Re: What potential
Chilly Willy <Melted@[  2007-04-08 04:38:32 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-08 11:21:57 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-08 14:43:37 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-08 20:53:03 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-08 23:14:28 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-20 16:11:18 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-25 03:09:24 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-25 21:33:03 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-26 06:18:10 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-26 09:17:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-27 04:33:08 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-27 06:49:30 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-27 10:30:59 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-27 20:36:25 
Re: What potential
e.m@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (b  2007-04-27 22:41:02 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:10:28 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:46:57 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:06:28 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:13:01 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:03:56 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:08:05 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-28 11:00:38 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:41:28 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 16:46:24 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:48:06 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:14:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:09:11 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-01 11:21:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:39:38 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-04 16:41:07 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-04 23:52:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:25:36 
So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"Beta_Troll" &l  2007-05-05 22:20:38 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-06 07:05:00 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:08:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-09 21:28:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-10 09:18:15 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:17:00 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-14 00:01:47 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-14 02:39:04 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-16 14:23:42 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:30:36 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-21 14:53:20 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:12:18 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-13 22:10:03 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:26:48 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-21 21:56:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:07:08 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-09 21:34:03 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:16:27 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-13 22:11:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:28:24 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-21 22:05:01 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-14 14:28:07 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:28:51 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:12:08 
Re: What potential
beer-fart@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-01 21:25:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:40:26 
Re: What potential
TomProx <anybody@[EMAI  2007-05-04 12:59:43 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:12:55 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:47:46 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:09:36 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:09:58 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:20:53 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:38:28 
Re: What potential
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-05-06 22:57:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:09:55 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:17:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:11:02 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-01 20:02:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:39:52 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-04 16:45:38 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:14:05 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-05 09:34:02 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-06 17:08:01 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-07 14:58:18 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-08 02:01:57 
Re: What potential
beer_fart@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-07 23:06:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:11:30 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-10 02:54:17 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:16:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:11:12 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-10 02:53:26 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:15:44 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:10:31 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:09:28 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:05:14 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-28 05:04:17 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:34:47 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 05:26:03 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:27:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:11:35 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:27:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:38:58 
Re: What potential
FR Bo-didillies <me@[E  2007-05-09 20:14:49 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:15:19 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-13 23:33:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-14 02:38:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Nov 18 19:14:15 CST 2008.