Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Graphics > Art Theft Scream Scream Scream > Re: What potent...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 81 of 106 Topic 530 of 558
Post > Topic >>

Re: What potential

by nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 5, 2007 at 05:14 AM

On Fri, 04 May 2007 16:45:38 -0400, Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>In article <apcl33164o7jdnbqipiplgm65b8ik1h2tr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>says...
>>
>
>>
>>'Bob&Carol'?  If you did revert to troll mode, 
>>or maybe troll-baiting, I might suggest that 
>>you become 'Ted&Alice'.  I *think* there was 
>>once (early seventies?) a film called 'Bob & 
>>Carol & Ted & Alice' or similar.  I forgot what 
>>the film was about.  (maybe wife-swapping?)
>>
>Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice. Not seventies, Sixties. Starred Elliot Gould
among 
>others. Would be wife-swapping. Promo showed four people in one bed.
Pretty 
>tame by today's standards. I suppose Wikipedia would tell all.

Wikipedia?  I'll give it a try.  

Ahh, yes:

 >After a weekend of emotional honesty at an 
 >Esalen-style retreat, Los Angeles sophisticates 
 >Bob and Carol Sanders (played by Robert Culp and 
 >Natalie Wood) return to their life determined to 
 >embrace free love and complete openness. Bob and 
 >Carol happily reveal their ensuing love affairs 
 >to everyone, sparking the curiosity and repulsion 
 >of their more conservative close friends Ted and 
 >Alice Henderson (Elliott Gould and Dyan Cannon).
 >
 >When the two couples travel together to Las Vegas, 
 >Ted admits an affair of his own. An outraged Alice 
 >demands that this new ethos be taken to its obvious 
 >conclusion: a mate-sharing foursome. Too old to be 
 >hippies and too young to be fogies, they sincerely 
 >attempt to try on the swinging lifestyle. But before 
 >they can begin, doubts arise.

<yawn>  Now I see why it never sparked much 
interest for me.  I never was a devout fan 
of American cinema to begin with, and this 
film really would be no exception.  I never 
saw it, only read about it.

--
nymnuts©
 




 106 Posts in Topic:
April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-01 09:29:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-01 22:40:08 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-02 22:28:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-03 01:29:05 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-03 20:05:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-03 23:27:01 
What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-04 07:58:35 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-04 21:40:01 
Re: What potential
Chilly Willy <Melted@[  2007-04-08 04:38:32 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-08 11:21:57 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-08 14:43:37 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-08 20:53:03 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-08 23:14:28 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-20 16:11:18 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-25 03:09:24 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-25 21:33:03 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-26 06:18:10 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-26 09:17:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-27 04:33:08 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-27 06:49:30 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-27 10:30:59 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-27 20:36:25 
Re: What potential
e.m@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (b  2007-04-27 22:41:02 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:10:28 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:46:57 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:06:28 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:13:01 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:03:56 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:08:05 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-28 11:00:38 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:41:28 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 16:46:24 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:48:06 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:14:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:09:11 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-01 11:21:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:39:38 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-04 16:41:07 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-04 23:52:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:25:36 
So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"Beta_Troll" &l  2007-05-05 22:20:38 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-06 07:05:00 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:08:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-09 21:28:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-10 09:18:15 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:17:00 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-14 00:01:47 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-14 02:39:04 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-16 14:23:42 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:30:36 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-21 14:53:20 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:12:18 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-13 22:10:03 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:26:48 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-21 21:56:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:07:08 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-09 21:34:03 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:16:27 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-13 22:11:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:28:24 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-21 22:05:01 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-14 14:28:07 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:28:51 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:12:08 
Re: What potential
beer-fart@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-01 21:25:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:40:26 
Re: What potential
TomProx <anybody@[EMAI  2007-05-04 12:59:43 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:12:55 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:47:46 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:09:36 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:09:58 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:20:53 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:38:28 
Re: What potential
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-05-06 22:57:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:09:55 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:17:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:11:02 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-01 20:02:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:39:52 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-04 16:45:38 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:14:05 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-05 09:34:02 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-06 17:08:01 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-07 14:58:18 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-08 02:01:57 
Re: What potential
beer_fart@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-07 23:06:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:11:30 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-10 02:54:17 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:16:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:11:12 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-10 02:53:26 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:15:44 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:10:31 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:09:28 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:05:14 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-28 05:04:17 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:34:47 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 05:26:03 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:27:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:11:35 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:27:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:38:58 
Re: What potential
FR Bo-didillies <me@[E  2007-05-09 20:14:49 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:15:19 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-13 23:33:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-14 02:38:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Nov 18 19:16:11 CST 2008.