Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Graphics > Art Theft Scream Scream Scream > Re: What potent...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 67 of 106 Topic 530 of 558
Post > Topic >>

Re: What potential

by TomProx <anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 4, 2007 at 12:59 PM

On Fri, 04 May 2007 04:40:26 +0000, nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On 1 May 2007 21:25:07 -0500, beer-fart@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (beer fart) wrote:
>
>>nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>news:f9ed33ttn3b0obunnarvioqc6c01jt2i1d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>
>>> On 30 Apr 2007 22:14:02 -0500, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:46:24 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>>>>> <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> >On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:41:28 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>>>>> ><°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:00:38 -0400, Gogarty
<Gogarty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> >>wrote: 
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>>In article <ofn433d3pmacfqqj89qfbd7ica11kg8q5a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>> >>>°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:30:59 -0400, Gogarty
>>>>> >>>><Gogarty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>>In article <ff6333d0h35ejurk18vus4sn5am1kla2re@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>> >>>>>°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:33:08 +0000, nymnuts©
>>>>> >>>>>><nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:17:33 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>>>>> >>>>>>><°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:18:10 +0000, nymnuts©
>>>>> >>>>>>>><nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On 25 Apr 2007 21:33:03 -0500, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>wrote: 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 4 Apr 2007 21:40:01 -0500, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> Is it worthwhile hanging out here for awhile?
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >No.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >I check here at least once a week for any postings and
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >just read  them. Mostly, people ping an individual,
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >leave a msg, small talk. At times a post will bring
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >lurkers and old timers out of the  woodwork. 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >The old posters are few these days.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >But do check here to see what might be happening.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Lurkers?  Old timers?
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey!  I resemble that remark!
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> nymnuts©
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Good God! The old timer has spoken! Great to see you.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Great to be here!  Great to see you as well.  
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I don't get on much anymore - there's not much 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>new in 'Usednet' these days, it seems.  Repost 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>after endless repost.  It was one helluva ride, 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>though, wasn't it?
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>after all those nice ls-videos & models there was really
>>>>> >>>>>>>>nothing what was worth collecting in the (young) **** fields
>>>>> >>>>>>>>since ... 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>gladly since I started this "special interest hobby" about a
>>>>> >>>>>>>>decade ago I always collected also NN-models from the start
>>>>> >>>>>>>>,so this brings still @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 least some good harvests,although I
>>>>> >>>>>>>>collect mostly vids & DVDs now (have a overkill with
>>>>> >>>>>>>>collecting pixies) 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>"have U brainwashed 2day?"
>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>High, Doc! <g>  Good to see you're still about.
>>>>> >>>>>>>Without your efforts Innocence would certainly 
>>>>> >>>>>>>be lost.  I don't think I am able to post there 
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>yeah,AOI is a never ending "problemchild" ... <s>
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>anymore - you may remember propagation issues I 
>>>>> >>>>>>>was always having.  And no Alan?  No Brundle?
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>no idea what happened 2 them,
>>>>> >>>>>>1 was using terrornews (bad service) ...
>>>>> >>>>>>miss their posting-sup****t,buTT best post this year from
others
>>>>> >>>>>>was definately those both 2 Morena Park-rips (hope 4 mo in the
>>>>> >>>>>>future) 
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>So many ISPs block groups at the drop of a hat 
>>>>> >>>>>>>these days.  Perhaps this has happened with 
>>>>> >>>>>>>their NSPs?  Yet the flood of spam continues 
>>>>> >>>>>>>in every group unabated...
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>mostly from newsfeeds
>>>>> >>>>>>(also verizon & astra)
>>>>> >>>>>>spammishers R really the worst case of parasites,
>>>>> >>>>>>and like pigeons or rats they bring only cancer
>>>>> >>>>>>2 most groups along with trolls
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>PS: still hope some day mo ls-videos pops-up,
>>>>> >>>>>>like stuff what never had been released due 2 closings
>>>>> >>>>>>of the sites AND mebbe even videos in *better quality*
>>>>> >>>>>>from the earlier issues - especially from issue 4
>>>>> >>>>>>( have a crush 4 the blackhaired cutie :O)
>>>>> >>>>>>or from those videoangels/video2000-releases
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>A news group exists that may satisfy your needs. Everything
ever
>>>>> >>>>>connected with LS, etc., seems to be getting posted there,
>>>>> >>>>>thousands of posts daily. I don't see how they physically
manage
>>>>> >>>>>to do it. I don't know how to give you  a 
>>>>> >>>>>hint that you will understand but the spammers won't.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>believe I know the spot already since quite some while
>>>>> >>>>(Eggplant tiped me once;O)
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>>>> >>>>  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>"have U brainwashed 2day?"
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>Think really, really bad weather and a popular ***ual position.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>so there is another froup ,
>>>>> >>if its "straight softcore" I should seek it then ...
>>>>> >
>>>>> >no luck...anyway-there is already a newborn & very active froup
>>>>> >(almost spam-free already) with all the ls-stuff (buTT I saw no
>>>>> >additions 2 my favs since there)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >reminds me only as I was send on a similar fruitless hunt 4
>>>>> >NN-schoolmodels (seeked 4 all Angel-sets as I was tiped
>>>>> >with some Riddles-simply had given up & cursed only TAT I 
>>>>> >had wasted my time)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>>>> >  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >"have U brainwashed 2day?"
>>>>> 
>>>>> I never cared for riddle games either, perhaps 
>>>>> because I am no good at them, or the clues are 
>>>>> always slanted to a particular locale.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Another of my pet peeves is those scrambled-text 
>>>>> messages that have become so popular.  Usenet has 
>>>>> become a very different place from it used to be.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So much for the 'free and open' forum.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> nymnuts©
>>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>What?! No pgp for you?<bg>
>>> 
>>> I'll pass on pgp, even if it means not being able 
>>> to find the imaginary 'secret group'. <bfg>
>>> 
>>> --
>>> nymnuts©
>>
>>
>>what about password protedected raRs's, you pass on them too/
>
>I pass on everything, even open posts.  
>I don't collect.  It was great fun once, 
>but it's basically over now, and has been 
>since 21 July 2003.  
>
>If you've lost an HD and still wish to 
>collect, there should be plenty to keep 
>you very busy in the open groups that 
>you already know about.
>
>Just be sure to back up anything that's 
>im****tant to you.  Happy hunting!  :-)

Hi  gents,

a relict still dreaming of p'te tomatoes takes the liberty to say "hi"

Tom
 




 106 Posts in Topic:
April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-01 09:29:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-01 22:40:08 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-02 22:28:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-03 01:29:05 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-03 20:05:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-03 23:27:01 
What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-04 07:58:35 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-04 21:40:01 
Re: What potential
Chilly Willy <Melted@[  2007-04-08 04:38:32 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-08 11:21:57 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-08 14:43:37 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-08 20:53:03 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-08 23:14:28 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-20 16:11:18 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-25 03:09:24 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-25 21:33:03 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-26 06:18:10 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-26 09:17:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-27 04:33:08 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-27 06:49:30 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-27 10:30:59 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-27 20:36:25 
Re: What potential
e.m@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (b  2007-04-27 22:41:02 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:10:28 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:46:57 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:06:28 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:13:01 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:03:56 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:08:05 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-28 11:00:38 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:41:28 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 16:46:24 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:48:06 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:14:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:09:11 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-01 11:21:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:39:38 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-04 16:41:07 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-04 23:52:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:25:36 
So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"Beta_Troll" &l  2007-05-05 22:20:38 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-06 07:05:00 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:08:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-09 21:28:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-10 09:18:15 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:17:00 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-14 00:01:47 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-14 02:39:04 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-16 14:23:42 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:30:36 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-21 14:53:20 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:12:18 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-13 22:10:03 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:26:48 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-21 21:56:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:07:08 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-09 21:34:03 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:16:27 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-13 22:11:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:28:24 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-21 22:05:01 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-14 14:28:07 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:28:51 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:12:08 
Re: What potential
beer-fart@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-01 21:25:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:40:26 
Re: What potential
TomProx <anybody@[EMAI  2007-05-04 12:59:43 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:12:55 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:47:46 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:09:36 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:09:58 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:20:53 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:38:28 
Re: What potential
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-05-06 22:57:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:09:55 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:17:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:11:02 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-01 20:02:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:39:52 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-04 16:45:38 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:14:05 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-05 09:34:02 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-06 17:08:01 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-07 14:58:18 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-08 02:01:57 
Re: What potential
beer_fart@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-07 23:06:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:11:30 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-10 02:54:17 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:16:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:11:12 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-10 02:53:26 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:15:44 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:10:31 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:09:28 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:05:14 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-28 05:04:17 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:34:47 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 05:26:03 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:27:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:11:35 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:27:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:38:58 
Re: What potential
FR Bo-didillies <me@[E  2007-05-09 20:14:49 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:15:19 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-13 23:33:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-14 02:38:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Nov 18 19:17:47 CST 2008.