Talk About Network

Google





Graphics > Art Theft Scream Scream Scream > Re: What potent...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 27 of 106 Topic 530 of 558
Post > Topic >>

Re: What potential

by Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 30, 2007 at 10:13 PM

> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 04:46:57 +0000, nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> 
> >On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:10:28 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
> ><°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> >>On 27 Apr 2007 22:41:02 -0500, e.m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (beer burp  tickle)
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >>>news:ofn433d3pmacfqqj89qfbd7ica11kg8q5a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:30:59 -0400, Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>>In article <ff6333d0h35ejurk18vus4sn5am1kla2re@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >>>>>°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says... 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:33:08 +0000, nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>>>>wrote: 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:17:33 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
> >>>>>>><°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:18:10 +0000, nymnuts©
> >>>>>>>><nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote: 
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>On 25 Apr 2007 21:33:03 -0500, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 4 Apr 2007 21:40:01 -0500, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> >> Is it worthwhile hanging out here for awhile?
> >>>>>>>>>>> >> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> >> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>> >No.
> >>>>>>>>>>> >I check here at least once a week for any postings and just
> >>>>>>>>>>> >read them. Mostly, people ping an individual, leave a msg,
> >>>>>>>>>>> >small talk. At times a post will bring lurkers and old
> >>>>>>>>>>> >timers out of the woodwork. 
> >>>>>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>> >The old posters are few these days.
> >>>>>>>>>>> >But do check here to see what might be happening.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Lurkers?  Old timers?
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey!  I resemble that remark!
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> nymnuts©
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Good God! The old timer has spoken! Great to see you.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Great to be here!  Great to see you as well.  
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>I don't get on much anymore - there's not much 
> >>>>>>>>>new in 'Usednet' these days, it seems.  Repost 
> >>>>>>>>>after endless repost.  It was one helluva ride,  though, wasn't
> >>>>>>>>>it? 
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>after all those nice ls-videos & models there was really
> >>>>>>>>nothing what was worth collecting in the (young) **** fields
> >>>>>>>>since ... 
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>gladly since I started this "special interest hobby" about a
> >>>>>>>>decade ago I always collected also NN-models from the start ,so
> >>>>>>>>this brings still @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 least some good harvests,although I collect
> >>>>>>>>mostly vids & DVDs now (have a overkill with collecting pixies)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
> >>>>>>>>  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>"have U brainwashed 2day?"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>High, Doc! <g>  Good to see you're still about.
> >>>>>>>Without your efforts Innocence would certainly 
> >>>>>>>be lost.  I don't think I am able to post there 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>yeah,AOI is a never ending "problemchild" ... <s>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>anymore - you may remember propagation issues I 
> >>>>>>>was always having.  And no Alan?  No Brundle?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>no idea what happened 2 them,
> >>>>>>1 was using terrornews (bad service) ...
> >>>>>>miss their posting-sup****t,buTT best post this year from others
> >>>>>>was definately those both 2 Morena Park-rips (hope 4 mo in the
> >>>>>>future) 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>So many ISPs block groups at the drop of a hat 
> >>>>>>>these days.  Perhaps this has happened with 
> >>>>>>>their NSPs?  Yet the flood of spam continues 
> >>>>>>>in every group unabated...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>mostly from newsfeeds
> >>>>>>(also verizon & astra)
> >>>>>>spammishers R really the worst case of parasites,
> >>>>>>and like pigeons or rats they bring only cancer
> >>>>>>2 most groups along with trolls
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>PS: still hope some day mo ls-videos pops-up,
> >>>>>>like stuff what never had been released due 2 closings
> >>>>>>of the sites AND mebbe even videos in *better quality*
> >>>>>>from the earlier issues - especially from issue 4
> >>>>>>( have a crush 4 the blackhaired cutie :O)
> >>>>>>or from those videoangels/video2000-releases
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>A news group exists that may satisfy your needs. Everything ever
> >>>>>connected with LS, etc., seems to be getting posted there,
> >>>>>thousands of posts daily. I don't see how they physically manage to
> >>>>>do it. I don't know how to give you a hint that you will understand
> >>>>>but the spammers won't. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> believe I know the spot already since quite some while
> >>>> (Eggplant tiped me once;O)
> >>>> 
> >>>>      d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
> >>>>  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>> 
> >>>> "have U brainwashed 2day?"
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>anyine the suddwer a HD crash will be happy anyway.  I propose a tost
> >>>to hotspots 
> >>
> >>
> >>yeah sure,
> >>and it it a BIG slap into the face of any "moral KKKrUSAders" ! 
> >>
> >>     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
> >>  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>
> >>"have U brainwashed 2day?"
> >
> >Shurly U R the only 1 N Usednet who could have 
> >decoded TAT mess above!  "anyine the suddwer"?
> 
> 
> *still* like 2 write warped since it gives those straight-
> (deadly boring aDULLts) types a instant headaGe <bfg>
> 
>      d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>   <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 
> "have U brainwashed 2day?"
> 

BAH! You ain't Herr Doktor if you fail to talk like that.
Don't stop.
It takes a bit to understand you, then seldom do I have a problem.
But every time you say TAT, I think of the ink lover.
 




 106 Posts in Topic:
April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-01 09:29:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-01 22:40:08 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-02 22:28:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-03 01:29:05 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-03 20:05:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-03 23:27:01 
What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-04 07:58:35 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-04 21:40:01 
Re: What potential
Chilly Willy <Melted@[  2007-04-08 04:38:32 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-08 11:21:57 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-08 14:43:37 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-08 20:53:03 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-08 23:14:28 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-20 16:11:18 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-25 03:09:24 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-25 21:33:03 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-26 06:18:10 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-26 09:17:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-27 04:33:08 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-27 06:49:30 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-27 10:30:59 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-27 20:36:25 
Re: What potential
e.m@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (b  2007-04-27 22:41:02 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:10:28 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:46:57 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:06:28 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:13:01 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:03:56 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:08:05 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-28 11:00:38 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:41:28 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 16:46:24 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:48:06 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:14:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:09:11 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-01 11:21:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:39:38 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-04 16:41:07 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-04 23:52:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:25:36 
So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"Beta_Troll" &l  2007-05-05 22:20:38 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-06 07:05:00 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:08:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-09 21:28:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-10 09:18:15 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:17:00 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-14 00:01:47 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-14 02:39:04 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-16 14:23:42 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:30:36 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-21 14:53:20 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:12:18 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-13 22:10:03 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:26:48 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-21 21:56:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:07:08 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-09 21:34:03 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:16:27 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-13 22:11:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:28:24 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-21 22:05:01 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-14 14:28:07 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:28:51 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:12:08 
Re: What potential
beer-fart@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-01 21:25:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:40:26 
Re: What potential
TomProx <anybody@[EMAI  2007-05-04 12:59:43 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:12:55 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:47:46 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:09:36 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:09:58 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:20:53 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:38:28 
Re: What potential
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-05-06 22:57:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:09:55 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:17:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:11:02 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-01 20:02:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:39:52 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-04 16:45:38 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:14:05 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-05 09:34:02 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-06 17:08:01 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-07 14:58:18 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-08 02:01:57 
Re: What potential
beer_fart@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-07 23:06:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:11:30 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-10 02:54:17 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:16:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:11:12 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-10 02:53:26 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:15:44 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:10:31 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:09:28 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:05:14 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-28 05:04:17 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:34:47 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 05:26:03 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:27:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:11:35 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:27:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:38:58 
Re: What potential
FR Bo-didillies <me@[E  2007-05-09 20:14:49 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:15:19 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-13 23:33:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-14 02:38:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 5:50:40 PST 2009.