Talk About Network

Google





Graphics > Art Theft Scream Scream Scream > Re: What potent...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 30 of 106 Topic 530 of 558
Post > Topic >>

Re: What potential

by Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 28, 2007 at 11:00 AM

In article <ofn433d3pmacfqqj89qfbd7ica11kg8q5a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
says...
>
>
>On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:30:59 -0400, Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <ff6333d0h35ejurk18vus4sn5am1kla2re@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>says...
>>>
>>>
>>>On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:33:08 +0000, nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:17:33 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>>>><°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:18:10 +0000, nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 25 Apr 2007 21:33:03 -0500, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4 Apr 2007 21:40:01 -0500, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> >> Is it worthwhile hanging out here for awhile?
>>>>>>>> >> 
>>>>>>>> >> 
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >No.
>>>>>>>> >I check here at least once a week for any postings and just read

them.
>>>>>>>> >Mostly, people ping an individual, leave a msg, small talk.
>>>>>>>> >At times a post will bring lurkers and old timers out of the 
woodwork.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >The old posters are few these days.
>>>>>>>> >But do check here to see what might be happening.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Lurkers?  Old timers?
>>>>>>>> Hey!  I resemble that remark!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> nymnuts©
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Good God! The old timer has spoken! Great to see you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Great to be here!  Great to see you as well.  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't get on much anymore - there's not much 
>>>>>>new in 'Usednet' these days, it seems.  Repost 
>>>>>>after endless repost.  It was one helluva ride, 
>>>>>>though, wasn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>after all those nice ls-videos & models there was really
>>>>>nothing what was worth collecting in the (young) **** fields
>>>>>since ... 
>>>>>
>>>>>gladly since I started this "special interest hobby" about a decade
>>>>>ago I always collected also NN-models from the start ,so this
>>>>>brings still @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 least some good harvests,although I collect mostly
vids
>>>>>& DVDs now (have a overkill with collecting pixies)
>>>>>
>>>>>     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>>>>  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>
>>>>>"have U brainwashed 2day?"
>>>>
>>>>High, Doc! <g>  Good to see you're still about.
>>>>Without your efforts Innocence would certainly 
>>>>be lost.  I don't think I am able to post there 
>>>
>>>
>>>yeah,AOI is a never ending "problemchild" ... <s>
>>>
>>>
>>>>anymore - you may remember propagation issues I 
>>>>was always having.  And no Alan?  No Brundle?
>>>
>>>
>>>no idea what happened 2 them,
>>>1 was using terrornews (bad service) ...
>>>miss their posting-sup****t,buTT best post this year from others was
>>>definately those both 2 Morena Park-rips (hope 4 mo in the future)
>>>
>>>
>>>>So many ISPs block groups at the drop of a hat 
>>>>these days.  Perhaps this has happened with 
>>>>their NSPs?  Yet the flood of spam continues 
>>>>in every group unabated...
>>>
>>>
>>>mostly from newsfeeds
>>>(also verizon & astra)
>>>spammishers R really the worst case of parasites,
>>>and like pigeons or rats they bring only cancer
>>>2 most groups along with trolls
>>>
>>>PS: still hope some day mo ls-videos pops-up,
>>>like stuff what never had been released due 2 closings
>>>of the sites AND mebbe even videos in *better quality*
>>>from the earlier issues - especially from issue 4
>>>( have a crush 4 the blackhaired cutie :O)
>>>or from those videoangels/video2000-releases
>>
>>
>>A news group exists that may satisfy your needs. Everything ever
connected 
>>with LS, etc., seems to be getting posted there, thousands of posts
daily. I 
>>don't see how they physically manage to do it. I don't know how to give
you 
a 
>>hint that you will understand but the spammers won't.
>
>
>believe I know the spot already since quite some while
>(Eggplant tiped me once;O)
>
>     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>"have U brainwashed 2day?"

Think really, really bad weather and a popular ***ual position.
 




 106 Posts in Topic:
April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-01 09:29:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-01 22:40:08 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-02 22:28:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-03 01:29:05 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-03 20:05:02 
Re: April Fool's Day for some people.
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-04-03 23:27:01 
What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-04 07:58:35 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-04 21:40:01 
Re: What potential
Chilly Willy <Melted@[  2007-04-08 04:38:32 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-08 11:21:57 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-08 14:43:37 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-08 20:53:03 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-08 23:14:28 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-20 16:11:18 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-25 03:09:24 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-25 21:33:03 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-26 06:18:10 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-26 09:17:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-27 04:33:08 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-27 06:49:30 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-27 10:30:59 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-27 20:36:25 
Re: What potential
e.m@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (b  2007-04-27 22:41:02 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:10:28 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:46:57 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:06:28 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:13:01 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:03:56 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:08:05 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-04-28 11:00:38 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:41:28 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 16:46:24 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:48:06 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:14:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:09:11 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-01 11:21:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:39:38 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-04 16:41:07 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-04 23:52:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:25:36 
So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"Beta_Troll" &l  2007-05-05 22:20:38 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-06 07:05:00 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:08:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-09 21:28:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-10 09:18:15 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:17:00 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-14 00:01:47 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-14 02:39:04 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-16 14:23:42 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:30:36 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-21 14:53:20 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:12:18 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-13 22:10:03 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:26:48 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-21 21:56:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:07:08 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-09 21:34:03 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:16:27 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-13 22:11:02 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:28:24 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-21 22:05:01 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-14 14:28:07 
Re: So you came back from the dead Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-21 06:28:51 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:12:08 
Re: What potential
beer-fart@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-01 21:25:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:40:26 
Re: What potential
TomProx <anybody@[EMAI  2007-05-04 12:59:43 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:12:55 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 04:47:46 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:09:36 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:09:58 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:20:53 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:38:28 
Re: What potential
enig@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2007-05-06 22:57:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:09:55 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-04-30 22:17:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:11:02 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-01 20:02:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:39:52 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-04 16:45:38 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-05 05:14:05 
Re: What potential
Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL   2007-05-05 09:34:02 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-06 17:08:01 
Re: What potential
Gogarty <Gogarty@[EMAI  2007-05-07 14:58:18 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-08 02:01:57 
Re: What potential
beer_fart@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-07 23:06:01 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:11:30 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-10 02:54:17 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:16:02 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:11:12 
Re: What potential
Mandalay <man@[EMAIL P  2007-05-10 02:53:26 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:15:44 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:10:31 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-09 06:09:28 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:05:14 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-28 05:04:17 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-28 15:34:47 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-04-30 05:26:03 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-04-30 08:27:07 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-01 05:11:35 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-01 07:27:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-04 04:38:58 
Re: What potential
FR Bo-didillies <me@[E  2007-05-09 20:14:49 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-13 20:15:19 
Re: What potential
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-05-13 23:33:33 
Re: What potential
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2007-05-14 02:38:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 6:12:16 PST 2009.