On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:02:06 GMT, Aubergine© <Aubergine©@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:40:38 -0400, "V@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <blackhole@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>wrote:
>
>>On 30 Jul 2006 12:44:03 -0500, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>In a totally off-topic waste of bandwidth bloviated thusly:
>>>
>>> On 30 Jul 2006, "V@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <blackhole@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> mumbled words that
[insert
>>> positive appreciation saying here]:
>>>
>>> > On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:57:32 GMT, "Pieter Georgeopoulis"
>>> > <alphadiego66medina@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> > In a totally off-topic waste of bandwidth bloviated thusly:
>>> >>
>>> >> It was after midnight and d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
had been pouring over the
>>> >> computer and various usenet posts of
>>> >> alt.art.theft.scream.scream.scream, a newsgroup which had died a
day
>>> >> before its 7th birthday. I mentioned that he had been spending a
lot of
>>> >> time studying the articles and asked him "What are you
looking-for?"
>>> >>
>>> >> "I'm determining the cause of death."
>>> >>
>>> >> "Cause of death," I laughed, "No posts!"
>>> >>
>>> >> He glared at me, pointed his index finger at my face, and
accentuating
>>> >> his words with his finger said, "Look! Buster! There is no such
thing
>>> >> as death due to no posts! Something goes wrong or you go on
posting."
>>> >> He returned to his computer and I didn't interrupt him again.
>>> >>
>>> >> I knew, as well as the doctor, that
alt.art.theft.scream.scream.scream
>>> >> wasn't in Google because of no posts. It wasn't in Google because
it
>>> >> was sucked dry by a bore as he typed nonsense on his keyboard from
the
>>> >> bar at closing time. And as soon as d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
glared at me, I
>>> >> realized the im****tance of determining whether boredom caused its
>>> >> death.
>>> >
>>> > Much better :-)
>>> >
>>>
>>> Help me to understand the original post.
>>>
>>> This group is not dead due to lack of posting. It is dead because
>>> "something went wrong" or "due to boredom"?
>>>
>>> If that be the case, then this dead group is alive and well with no
bored
>>> posts? But we have no good post either cause there are no posters.
>>>
>>> So, if I think correctly, this group is a healthy, happy, empty group?
>>>
>>> MMmmmmmmmm??? Let me think .... Mmmmmmmm???
>>> Can some person post Shadetree's photos or should I cross-post this to
Y&B?
>>>
>>> TIA!
>>> daytek
>>
>>Strange you should ask. I just saw a large, albeit incomplete
>>collection circulating. One of the greats. You obviously remember.
>
>You're obviously as undead as I am. <g>
There's only one Undead. Now really!
..
|
