On 30 Jul 2006, "V@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <blackhole@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> mumbled words that [insert
positive appreciation saying here]:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:57:32 GMT, "Pieter Georgeopoulis"
> <alphadiego66medina@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In a totally off-topic waste of bandwidth bloviated thusly:
>>
>> It was after midnight and d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
had been pouring over the
>> computer and various usenet posts of
>> alt.art.theft.scream.scream.scream, a newsgroup which had died a day
>> before its 7th birthday. I mentioned that he had been spending a lot of
>> time studying the articles and asked him "What are you looking-for?"
>>
>> "I'm determining the cause of death."
>>
>> "Cause of death," I laughed, "No posts!"
>>
>> He glared at me, pointed his index finger at my face, and accentuating
>> his words with his finger said, "Look! Buster! There is no such thing
>> as death due to no posts! Something goes wrong or you go on posting."
>> He returned to his computer and I didn't interrupt him again.
>>
>> I knew, as well as the doctor, that alt.art.theft.scream.scream.scream
>> wasn't in Google because of no posts. It wasn't in Google because it
>> was sucked dry by a bore as he typed nonsense on his keyboard from the
>> bar at closing time. And as soon as d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
glared at me, I
>> realized the im****tance of determining whether boredom caused its
>> death.
>
> Much better :-)
>
Help me to understand the original post.
This group is not dead due to lack of posting. It is dead because
"something went wrong" or "due to boredom"?
If that be the case, then this dead group is alive and well with no bored
posts? But we have no good post either cause there are no posters.
So, if I think correctly, this group is a healthy, happy, empty group?
MMmmmmmmmm??? Let me think .... Mmmmmmmm???
Can some person post Shadetree's photos or should I cross-post this to
Y&B?
TIA!
daytek
|
