Talk About Network

Google





Graphics > Art Theft Scream Scream Scream > Re: strangelove
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 8 Topic 493 of 558
Post > Topic >>

Re: strangelove

by "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 20, 2006 at 08:43 AM

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 07:28:27 +0000, nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:33:42 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
><°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:03:10 -0500, Splacknuck
>><splacknuck@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>I saw it. Is this about the spammer?
>>
>>
>>yep. 
>>(when U re****t,make sure U re****t the
>>row with the "spamheaders")
>>
>>RE has my addy if U have any ???
>>
>>     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>>"have U brainwashed 2day?"
>
>Congrats and thanks are in order for your combined 
>efforts in eliminating the voyeurnut spam.



the medal goes 2 a certain person who likes 2 stay in the shadows



>
>I would like to help with the spam re****ting, but 
>I am not quite certain that my previous attempts 
>to help were successful.  
>
>From your post above, it would seem that re****ting 
>is much more effective when multiple people re****t 
>the same exact spam post.  Is this correct?  (I had 

TATs 4 sure,also a strong FAQ/Charter helps


>just been re****ting the first or maybe last message 
>of any given post.)  I'm not stupid, merely ignorant.  
>I would appreciate any enlightenment you could share 
>on effective spam re****ting techniques.
>
>Also, I've been wondering what type of mail accounts 
>might be best for re****ting spam.  I have nym mail 
>at n.a.n., but I have never bothered to re****t spam 
>from that account, as I think that it would be safe 
>to assume that any re****ting from there would go 
>unheeded.  However, *some* form of multiple throw-
>away anon mail accounts to re****t spam from would 
>be nice.  Any suggestions?
>
>- nymnuts©


2 paranoid 2 let all infos public out,I use only 2 "tag"
the headers ("SPAMHEADERS") so users who may not have the "skill" 2
make headers visible can also help out.

the main ingridience is patience,many readercompanies have def ears
when they receive complaints (like verizon,newsfeeds),in such cases U
may switch 2 "guerilla-tactiX" or simply destroy the spammishers
site/income ...

     d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

"have U brainwashed 2day?"
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
strangelove
Splacknuck <splacknuck  2006-02-15 00:03:10 
Re: strangelove
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2006-02-15 06:33:42 
Re: strangelove
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2006-02-15 16:56:45 
Re: strangelove
Splacknuck <splacknuck  2006-02-16 03:19:58 
Re: strangelove
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2006-02-16 10:41:37 
Re: strangelove
nymnuts© <nymnuts@[EMA  2006-03-20 07:28:27 
Re: strangelove
"d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTE  2006-03-20 08:43:13 
Re: strangelove
Splacknuck <splacknuck  2006-03-24 02:38:06 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Wed Jan 7 13:17:09 PST 2009.