On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:33:42 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
<°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:03:10 -0500, Splacknuck
><splacknuck@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>I saw it. Is this about the spammer?
>
>
>yep.
>(when U re****t,make sure U re****t the
>row with the "spamheaders")
>
>RE has my addy if U have any ???
>
> d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>"have U brainwashed 2day?"
Congrats and thanks are in order for your combined
efforts in eliminating the voyeurnut spam.
I would like to help with the spam re****ting, but
I am not quite certain that my previous attempts
to help were successful.
From your post above, it would seem that re****ting
is much more effective when multiple people re****t
the same exact spam post. Is this correct? (I had
just been re****ting the first or maybe last message
of any given post.) I'm not stupid, merely ignorant.
I would appreciate any enlightenment you could share
on effective spam re****ting techniques.
Also, I've been wondering what type of mail accounts
might be best for re****ting spam. I have nym mail
at n.a.n., but I have never bothered to re****t spam
from that account, as I think that it would be safe
to assume that any re****ting from there would go
unheeded. However, *some* form of multiple throw-
away anon mail accounts to re****t spam from would
be nice. Any suggestions?
- nymnuts©
|
