On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:19:58 -0500, Splacknuck
<splacknuck@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>In article <f8n6v1tjv0it23q46jc1ma6vvlq8gcis9p@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:33:42 GMT, "d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>> <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:03:10 -0500, Splacknuck
>> ><splacknuck@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >
>> >>I saw it. Is this about the spammer?
>> >
>> >
>> >yep.
>> >(when U re****t,make sure U re****t the
>> >row with the "spamheaders")
>> >
>> >RE has my addy if U have any ???
>> >
>> > d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >
>> >"have U brainwashed 2day?"
>>
>>
>> seems this guerilla-tactic had suceeded...<bfg>
>>
>> d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>> "have U brainwashed 2day?"
>
>Good news then <g>. I re****ted to a couple of different places, making
>use of the Path: header....
will wreck his whole biz,just saw the asshole returned 2 his 7-hours
spamming routine...
d®.§t®@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<°@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
"have U brainwashed 2day?"
|
