On 12 Feb 2006 14:57:02 -0600, Daytek <Daytek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Sun 12 Feb 2006 01:16:11p, Little Elvis! <le@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> NY Times February 12, 2006
>>
>> The Case of the Missing Munchs
>>
>
>....snip...snip...snip....
>
>>
>> THE thieves struck on the morning of Aug. 22, 2004, not long after the
>> Munch Museum had opened. Many of the 80 or so visitors there were
>> clustered in the ground-floor gallery, where the collection's most
>> precious paintings were on display.
>>
>>
>> Speaking in the cafeteria, feet away from where the thieves entered
>> the museum in 2004, Mrs. Christoffersen tried not to criticize the
>> police, saying she believed they were doing the best they could. But a
>> museum without its masterpiece is like a body without a limb.
>>
>> "For us, the im****tant thing is to have our paintings back," she said.
>>
>>
>
>I am sure this is a nice article with a happy ending but it is tooooooo
>long and requires much time to read it.
>
>I didn't have time, so could you post a summary?
>
>TIA!
It was possibly the only on-topic post in the history of this
newsgroup.
|
