"StainlessSteelRat" <SSS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Jf1rf.55647$%X.41581@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Ruferbeast" <beast@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:l_6dnSlKL6KqLTbenZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On 28 Dec 2000 04:06:55 GMT, pete@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Peter Wabbit) banged
away
> > on his/her/it's keyboard, and the results are as follows:
> > $In article <t4it6j4k93odda@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Rufus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > $stammered and mumbled something about...
> > $>
> > $>Group
> > $>
> > $> I know that some of you feel that anything is OK and freely express
the
> > $>opinion that there are no bounds, especially in this somewhat outlaw
> > group.
> > $>The Katya's showed up here and the discussion will be here and
perhaps
> > that
> > $>is quite fitting considering that there will be a broader range of
> > opinion.
> > $>
> > $> My question is this: Will part of this set be removed for the
> > responsible
> > $>posters? Many of us do not want to be KP posters and I'm wondering
if
> > this
> > $>new direction for the Rusky sets will create some problems.
> > $>
> > $> Any opinions are welcome. There is no need to answer this
immediatly
> > since
> > $>many have not downloaded the entire set, just yet and will need time
to
> > $>think about it as well. At least one other set from the Lolitas
> > life/love
> > $>sites are too explicit to be beauty pix.
> > $>
> > $> Wait a couple of days and then give your opinion. I collect them
all
> > $>(opinions) even the ones like this >>**** off asshole Rufffer...just
> > because
> > $>you are a candy -ass jerkoff....leave the posting to the real
> > $>men<<<..........I just made that up so work on a better one if you
are
> > so
> > $>inclined.
> > $>
> > $> Rufe
> > $>
> > $>
> > $>
> > $>
> > $I'm of the school that "If you don't like it, don't download it."
And
> > I'm
> > not
> > $convinced that there is any more, or any less child abuse in these
> > pictures if
> > $there are more explicit poses. It's obvious that even in some of the
> > tame
> > $sets that the girls, for whatever reason appear that they don't like
the
> > $situation they're in. But I'm not a judge of that nor am I able to
say
> > for
> > $sure the girl is being abused or not being abused. We could go on
for
> > ever
> > $either justifying their apparent dislike for what they are doing, or
> > ripping
> > $the photographer apart for his apparent abuse. We will never know
and
> > the
> > $arguement will never be resolved. This group is an open group and if
the
> > $pictures posted are "your collection of lolita's and teens" either
soft
> > or
> > $hard then it is in keeping with the theme of Atom's original MCLT
series
> > which
> > $was a mixture of both soft and hard. Collect what you like. Pass up
the
> > rest
> > $and pray/meditate for the little girls safety!
> > <
> >>My comment will be short and sweet, so to speak.
> >
> >>I agree with Pete wholeheartedly! Nothing will be gained, or lost
> >>by any discussion. People will post what they want, and that is the
> >>reality of Usenet! If you don't like it, don't d/l it!!
> >
> >>Now, Pete, when are you going to scan that Japanese book of ****s?
> >>I've been waiting for how many months now?? <BG>
> > --
> >>Tattooed©
> >
>
> happy now..i'm down at the bottom here,where's it's dark.
> so,..what else have you been storing away in your filing cabinet ? :0
> your worse than my x wife...she never forgot a arguement, at least not
her
> end
> of the debate...I suppose i should say 'o rufe...you were right..we
should
> have stuck with looking at nuns wrinkly socks' and then i wouldn't be
> wading knee deep in it...
>
> sp
actually I don't why I save all this stuff. I think maybe the idea was
that
someday the world would be ready to hear what happened ...but I'm usually
wrong about most things on the web...never try to predict the outcome of
anything in this crazy place.
Spidey...can you tell me (in plain language that this ol' dog can
understand) what happened with you and your bust? Gimme the whole lowdown.
Write several pages...
r
|
