"Ruferbeast" <beast@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:l_6dnSlKL6KqLTbenZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 28 Dec 2000 04:06:55 GMT, pete@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Peter Wabbit) banged
away
> on his/her/it's keyboard, and the results are as follows:
> $In article <t4it6j4k93odda@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Rufus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> $stammered and mumbled something about...
> $>
> $>Group
> $>
> $> I know that some of you feel that anything is OK and freely express
the
> $>opinion that there are no bounds, especially in this somewhat outlaw
> group.
> $>The Katya's showed up here and the discussion will be here and perhaps
> that
> $>is quite fitting considering that there will be a broader range of
> opinion.
> $>
> $> My question is this: Will part of this set be removed for the
> responsible
> $>posters? Many of us do not want to be KP posters and I'm wondering if
> this
> $>new direction for the Rusky sets will create some problems.
> $>
> $> Any opinions are welcome. There is no need to answer this immediatly
> since
> $>many have not downloaded the entire set, just yet and will need time
to
> $>think about it as well. At least one other set from the Lolitas
> life/love
> $>sites are too explicit to be beauty pix.
> $>
> $> Wait a couple of days and then give your opinion. I collect them all
> $>(opinions) even the ones like this >>**** off asshole Rufffer...just
> because
> $>you are a candy -ass jerkoff....leave the posting to the real
> $>men<<<..........I just made that up so work on a better one if you are
> so
> $>inclined.
> $>
> $> Rufe
> $>
> $>
> $>
> $>
> $I'm of the school that "If you don't like it, don't download it." And
> I'm
> not
> $convinced that there is any more, or any less child abuse in these
> pictures if
> $there are more explicit poses. It's obvious that even in some of the
> tame
> $sets that the girls, for whatever reason appear that they don't like
the
> $situation they're in. But I'm not a judge of that nor am I able to say
> for
> $sure the girl is being abused or not being abused. We could go on for
> ever
> $either justifying their apparent dislike for what they are doing, or
> ripping
> $the photographer apart for his apparent abuse. We will never know and
> the
> $arguement will never be resolved. This group is an open group and if
the
> $pictures posted are "your collection of lolita's and teens" either soft
> or
> $hard then it is in keeping with the theme of Atom's original MCLT
series
> which
> $was a mixture of both soft and hard. Collect what you like. Pass up
the
> rest
> $and pray/meditate for the little girls safety!
> <
>>My comment will be short and sweet, so to speak.
>
>>I agree with Pete wholeheartedly! Nothing will be gained, or lost
>>by any discussion. People will post what they want, and that is the
>>reality of Usenet! If you don't like it, don't d/l it!!
>
>>Now, Pete, when are you going to scan that Japanese book of ****s?
>>I've been waiting for how many months now?? <BG>
> --
>>Tattooed©
>
happy now..i'm down at the bottom here,where's it's dark.
so,..what else have you been storing away in your filing cabinet ? :0
your worse than my x wife...she never forgot a arguement, at least not her
end
of the debate...I suppose i should say 'o rufe...you were right..we
should
have stuck with looking at nuns wrinkly socks' and then i wouldn't be
wading knee deep in it...
sp
>
|
